MIXT
Selected Display
Dr. Lang firmly believes in the obligation to contribute, share expertise, offer assistance, and provide guidance whenever feasible. She recognizes her responsibility as a global citizen and actively strives to fulfill her duty to make a positive impact.
ONTOLOGICAL LENSES OF
THE FIVE DIMENSIONS
Exploring Dimensions of Existence: Supernatural, Cognition, Natural, Social, and Consciousness
I want to take a moment to shed light on the proposed concept of the five-dimensional ontological state, recognizing that while this framework provides a structured understanding of existence, it remains open to the possibility of additional dimensions yet to be fully explored or understood. Individuals tend to prioritize different dimensions as the foundation of their ethos, shaping their perception of reality. For much of recent history, natural science has been treated as the dominant epistemological framework, often dogmatized to the extent that it is viewed as the sole legitimate way to understand existence. This scientific lens continues to hold significant influence, with many asserting that all other dimensions of reality must ultimately be reducible to or explained by natural science. However, such an assertion is remarkably bold, given the inherent limitations of both human perception and the tools we use to explore the natural world.
Natural science continues to have limitations in capturing all of reality. Authentic natural scientists are fully aware of the constraints of human sensory perception and technological instrumentation. As humans, our biological faculties do not encapsulate every possible receptor that could detect or interact with all aspects of reality. Even the most sophisticated tools we have built are limited in their ability to capture existence beyond our physiological and technological constraints fully. To illustrate this, consider Type 2 diabetes. A person with this condition may produce insulin, yet their body’s receptors may be resistant to it. As a result, despite insulin being present in the bloodstream, it does not produce the necessary physiological response. However, this does not mean insulin does not exist—it simply means the body fails to recognize and utilize it properly. In some cases, dietary or lifestyle changes can "awaken" these receptors, enabling them to recognize insulin and restore function. This example parallels the limitations of a purely natural science-driven worldview. If we presume that the natural science dimension is the only relevant dimension of our ontological state, we risk ignoring entire realms of existence simply because we lack the perceptual "receptors" to recognize them. If we, as human beings, cannot detect certain phenomena due to the constraints of our biological or technological apparatus, does that mean they do not exist? The limitations of natural science in fully capturing and understanding reality vary across species and contexts, as perception and cognition are inherently shaped by biological, environmental, and epistemological constraints. Different species experience reality through unique sensory and cognitive frameworks, meaning that what is empirically accessible to one species may remain entirely imperceptible to another. For instance, some animals can detect ultraviolet light, infrasound, or electromagnetic fields, phenomena that lie beyond the human sensory range. This discrepancy highlights how scientific inquiry, while powerful, is ultimately constrained by the perceptual and technological tools available to a given species.
Additionally, the scope of natural science is context-dependent, as different fields of inquiry operate within distinct methodological boundaries. While natural science excels in examining physical, measurable phenomena, it often falls short when addressing abstract, subjective, or metaphysical aspects of reality, such as consciousness, meaning, morality, and existential inquiry. In such cases, other dimensions of knowledge—such as philosophy, theology, and social sciences—become necessary to provide a more holistic understanding of reality. Thus, the oversight of natural science is not uniform but rather contextual and species-dependent, reminding us that our methods of understanding must remain flexible and open to dimensions beyond the strictly material. We must resist the myopic and reductionist assumption that natural science is the sole framework through which all existence can be understood. It represents only one dimension within a broader ontological structure. The social dimension, for instance, is not merely a derivative of natural science; instead, it emerges as a distinct yet deeply interwoven entity shaped by the interplay of multiple interacting dimensions, including—but not limited to—the natural dimension. Its existence cannot be fully reduced to biological or physical principles alone, as it encapsulates the complexities of human interaction, culture, and collective meaning beyond what empirical methodologies alone can capture.
Thus, a rigid, reductionist perspective that confines reality solely to the physical/natural scientific dimension is inherently flawed, as it dismisses the validity of other fundamental dimensions—including the social/secular, spiritual/supernatural, cognitive/mental, and consciousness/soul dimensions. Just as our biological and perceptual limitations prevent us from fully experiencing all that exists, a strictly natural science-based worldview inherently constrains our ability to engage with deeper ontological truths that extend beyond empirical measurement. Acknowledging this reality does not diminish the value of science; instead, it situates it within a broader, more comprehensive framework that recognizes the multidimensional nature of existence and the interplay between different dimensions in shaping our understanding of reality.
This rich tapestry of dimensional experiences—Supernatural/Spiritual, Cognition/Mental, Natural/Physical, Social/Secular, and Consciousness/Soul—interweaves to form the essence of human existence, each offering a unique perspective on the nature of reality. These experiences span diverse dimensions that collectively define our human journey, ranging from the ethereal and spiritual to the tangible and natural, from intellectual and cognitive realms to the profound depths of consciousness and the intricacies of our social fabric. Historically, these dimensions have alternately dominated societal paradigms, shaping the contours of our world. Acknowledging their impact reveals a spectrum of both uplifting and distressing consequences throughout history. These dimensions intertwine, influencing our individual and collective encounters with life's mysteries. The paradigm shifts across these five dimensions have significantly reshaped historical narratives and societal structures, yielding both positive advancements and detrimental outcomes. While various academic disciplines have emerged under these dimensions, contemporary scholarship has predominantly focused on the social and natural dimensions, striving to unravel their complexities and understand their profound influence on our lives.
Spiritual/Supernatural
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Description: The supernatural or spiritual dimension pertains to phenomena that transcend the natural world and are often associated with religious or metaphysical beliefs. This dimension involves deities, the afterlife, miracles, and transcendent experiences. Various religious traditions offer unique interpretations of the supernatural, contributing to the development of faith systems. Historically, the supernatural and spiritual dimensions reigned supreme, wielding the power of religious systems to shape civilizations. This dimension has significantly influenced societal norms and values through religious or spiritual doctrines, often serving as a moral compass and a source of community identity. Academic disciplines emerging from this dimension include spirituality studies, theology, comparative religion, metaphysics, and mythology.
Historical Impact: The spiritual/supernatural dimension historically legitimized rulers and societal norms. Ancient civilizations, such as Egypt and Mesopotamia, relied heavily on religious frameworks, with rulers often considered divine. The Church in medieval Europe exerted significant influence over politics and social structures, guiding morality and laws.
Current Impact: In modern times, spirituality's influence has diminished in governance but remains significant in personal identity and community values. Individuals increasingly seek meaning and connection through spirituality rather than traditional religious institutions.
Hailing: Ancient Egypt's divine kingship justified pharaohs’ authority and promoted social order and stability through religious rituals and societal norms.
Wailing: Religious wars and persecutions (e.g., the Crusades) led to significant loss of life, societal division, and a legacy of conflict that still influences inter-religious relations today.
​
​
​
Cognitive/Mental
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Description: The cognition, or mental dimension, focuses on perception, thought, and reasoning processes. This dimension plays a crucial role in the philosophical nurturing of inquiry, which is central to discussions on philosophical reasoning. Following the religious age, the cognitive-mental dimension gained prominence during the Enlightenment. This era spotlighted cognitive reasoning and intellectual exploration.
​
Historical Impact: The cognitive /mental dimension has historically emphasized reason and individualism, particularly during the “Enlightenment era.” “Enlightenment thinkers” advocated for reason as the primary source of knowledge and understanding. They believed that human beings could apply rational thought to all areas of life, including governance. The Enlightenment encouraged critical thinking and skepticism toward traditional authorities, including the Church and monarchy. Thinkers like Voltaire and Rousseau questioned the legitimacy of absolute rule and promoted ideas of democracy and social contracts.
Current Impact: Today, rational thought guides public discourse and policy-making. The emphasis on critical thinking influences educational systems and societal norms, promoting a more informed citizenry capable of questioning authority and advocating for change.
​
Hailing: Enlightenment philosophers like Locke and Rousseau emphasized rights and individual freedoms, shaping democratic governance and civil rights movements.
Wailing: Rationalism can lead to dehumanization, as seen in social Darwinism and the eugenics movement, where cognitive dissonance in reasoning was misapplied to justify discrimination and inhumane practices.
​
​
Natural/Physical
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Description: The natural or physical dimension encompasses the observable universe and its phenomena governed by physical laws. It includes fields such as physics, chemistry, biology, and geology. From subatomic particles to galaxies, this dimension explores the composition, structure, function, and interactions of matter and energy, uncovering physical laws that lead to technological advancements. This shift has propelled scientific understanding, shaping contemporary views and policies. Academic disciplines in this dimension include foundational sciences like physics, chemistry, biology, environmental science, and technology.
​
Historical Impact: The natural/physical dimension through natural scientific inquiry emerged as a dominant force during the Scientific Revolution, fundamentally altering human understanding of the natural world and challenging religious explanations for natural phenomena. Scientific advancements laid the groundwork for modern medicine, engineering, and technology, which have shaped societal frameworks.
Current Impact: Advancements in natural sciences, particularly in genetics, immunology, and environmental science, significantly influence public health, policy, and global challenges like climate change. Reliance on empirical evidence drives technological innovation and informs healthcare practices, improving quality of life.
​
Hailing: Scientific advancements, such as vaccines, have eradicated diseases (e.g., smallpox) and improved public health outcomes globally.
Wailing: Environmental degradation due to industrialization and climate change threatens ecosystems and human health, raising ethical concerns about sustainability and responsibility to future generations.
​
​
​
Social/Secular
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Description: The social or secular dimension examines human interactions, relationships, and social structures. It encompasses psychology, sociology, anthropology, humanities, economics, and political science. Social theories explore human societies' structures, historical norms, and cultural dynamics. This dimension profoundly influences current societal frameworks, ushering in an era focused on equity and justice. A paradigm shift is underway, moving away from the dogmas of natural sciences to embrace the intricate tapestry of human experiences unveiled by social and secular lenses.
Historical Impact: The social/secular dimension has shifted the focus from other dimensions to social justice and individual rights. Social contract theories are currently laid as the groundwork for modern democratic governance, emphasizing the importance of consent and collective rights. Movements advocating for civil rights and social justice have fundamentally altered societal norms and expectations regarding equality and representation.
Current Impact: In contemporary society, social justice movements highlight the ongoing struggles for equality, representation, and systemic change. The rise of identity politics reflects a growing awareness of the complexities of social identities and the navigation of intersectional issues in advocacy and policy-making.
Hailing: Social equality movements (such as the Civil Rights Movement in the US) advance social justice and equality, leading to landmark legislation and cultural shifts.
Wailing: Social polarization and backlash against marginalized groups exacerbate inequality and societal division, highlighting ongoing struggles for societal equity across society's diverse social landscape.
​
​
​
Consciousness/Soul
​
​
​
​
​​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Description: The consciousness or soul dimension pertains to self-awareness and subjective experiences. Concepts of the soul and consciousness vary across cultures and belief systems. This emerging dimension intertwines with our awareness of existence. Today’s youth show a growing interest in this dimension, contemplating the nuances of ethics and morality, particularly as we interface with artificial intelligence (AI) and the possibility of AI becoming a conscious entity. As academia turns its gaze toward the consciousness/soul dimension, it unravels its enigmatic threads through phenomenology, mindfulness, and meditation studies.
​
Historical Impact: The focus on consciousness has historically led to discussions about the nature of existence, morality, and human experience, but historically, this dimension has not gained its prevalence as an isolated dimensional force outside of spirituality and metaphysical practices.
Current Impact: However, there is a rising emphasis on identity and self-awareness outside religious frameworks and a growing recognition of the importance of self-care and emotional well-being. This has increased the integration of self-care practices in therapy, education, and personal development, promoting a holistic sense of interconnectedness and communal relatedness.
​
Hailing: Self-care practices improve mental health and emotional regulation, contributing to individual well-being and resilience (e.g., Stress Reduction programs).
Wailing: Overemphasis on individualism can lead to isolation and neglect of community welfare, as personal success is prioritized over collective well-being.
​​​
​
​ETHOS-EMPATHY-EQUITY | 3E's
"me-you-coexistence"
​​
Given that each individual’s experiences are distinct, we are faced with a fundamental question:
​
Should we embrace others' experiences, even if it means setting aside our own philosophical beliefs and conceding to an increasing dominance?
Or,
​
Can we recognize and honor others' experiences without sacrificing our philosophical principles, and instead promote peaceful coexistence without yielding to an encroaching hegemony?
Understanding that everyone perceives the world through their own unique perspectives—shaped by various dimensions of thought and experience—is essential. These dimensions, which can range from one to five or more, form the basis of each person’s philosophical outlook or ethos. The specific dimensions chosen—whether individually or in combination—define how we understand existence and guide our interpretations of life. Within these dimensions, a spectrum of perspectives emerges, allowing each individual to develop their own worldview. This diversity is significant, as people use their chosen lenses to interpret and navigate their experiences, forming the epistemological and ontological essence of their being. Even among those who share common beliefs within a particular dimension, there is rich diversity that highlights the uniqueness of every individual. In the pursuit of equitable coexistence, it becomes essential to explore strategies that foster harmony despite the varying dimensions guiding societal perspectives. Living in a world where people adhere to different frameworks of decision-making and understanding requires a strong focus on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). The challenge lies not in suppressing differences but in crafting ways for diverse dimensions to coexist without conflict.
​
To navigate diversity and promote coexistence, I rely on a framework I call the "3E's": Ethos, Empathy, and Equity. This conceptual guide is a compass for embracing diversity and fostering societal harmony.
First, Ethos—the understanding of one's core dispositions. It encourages deep introspection, allowing us to recognize the unique qualities that shape our perspectives across different dimensions. Ethos involves an intimate self-examination where one reflects on identity, existence, and the complexities of their individual makeup. It forms the foundation for engaging with the world, shaping our values, and guiding our behavior. When we understand that every individual sees the world through a distinct set of lenses, we can better appreciate and embrace the diversity of human experience. Ethos represents the moral fabric that drives our interactions, acknowledging that a blend of different perspectives influences personal values and societal norms. This diverse worldview shapes our ethos, acting as the core of our actions and interactions.
Second, Empathy is more than simply understanding someone else's situation superficially; it is the ability to genuinely immerse oneself in another’s perspective. This involves not just listening to their words or observing their actions but actively acknowledging that even when someone’s values, experiences, or beliefs differ from ours, they remain equally valid from their perspective. Empathy does not demand that we adopt those differing values; rather, it calls for us to respect them as equally legitimate. Without empathy, these differences can become sources of division, potentially leading to societal conflict. However, with empathy, they provide a foundation for more equitable coexistence. Importantly, empathy does not require us to experience another person's life, which is impossible directly. We can never fully live through someone else's exact circumstances, emotions, or experiences. Instead, empathy involves drawing on our own emotions and reflecting on how they connect with another person’s situation. It is about recognizing how we might feel in their position and acknowledging how others might perceive our lived reality if the roles were reversed. This process of reflection helps us cultivate a deeper understanding of others, even if we cannot fully share their lived experience. This approach differs significantly from sympathy, which often leads to feelings of pity or superiority. Sympathy can create a dynamic where the person offering it feels detached or elevated above the person they are trying to "support." True empathy, in contrast, requires us to view ourselves as equals. It’s not about feeling sorry for someone but recognizing our shared human vulnerabilities, even when our experiences are mutually exclusive. Empathy enables us to navigate these differences with respect and a shared commitment to equitable coexistence.
Thirdly, Equity is the dynamic practice of fostering fair and inclusive coexistence. It involves balancing the interplay between our own ethos and the empathy we extend toward others. Equity is not forging a melting pot of competing ideologies but a navigation process that promotes harmonious co-existence, even in mutual exclusivity. Equity seeks to ensure that everyone can participate fully and fairly in society, honoring the richness of human experiences. It is the guiding principle that integrates and respects diversity, ensuring that differences do not lead to exclusion. Equity, as the foundational principle, governs how we achieve harmony amidst diverse perspectives. The interplay between ethos and empathy functions as a “Mirror-Window” dynamic—reflecting our individual ontological and epistemological states while also serving as a window into the worldviews of others. This process is analogous to the metaphor of interlocking puzzle pieces: each piece, though distinct in shape and form, fits perfectly because of its uniqueness. This vivid image highlights the importance of our differences, not as reasons for division but as building blocks of a vibrant and multifaceted human tapestry.
Our diversity should not lead to divisiveness but should instead contribute to a rich, interconnected world where differences create beauty in unity.
Bibliography:
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. Macmillan.
| Provides a comprehensive overview of cognitive psychology, covering key theories, mental processes, and their implications for understanding human behavior and thought. It’s a valuable resource for deeply exploring cognitive functions and the mental dimension.
Blackmore, S. (2017). Consciousness: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
| Blackmore discusses theories of consciousness, the nature of subjective experience, and the implications of consciousness for understanding the mind and self.
Crenshaw, K. W. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. The New Press.
| Work emphasizes the significance of social equity, particularly through the lens of intersectionality, which she coined. This concept examines how various forms of identity—such as race, gender, and class—interact to create unique experiences of oppression and privilege.
DeVries, Willem. "Subjective spirit: Soul, consciousness, intelligence and will." The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel (2013): 133-156.
| Explores Hegel's philosophy regarding the subjective aspects of human experience. It discusses how Hegel perceives the interplay between the soul, consciousness, intelligence, and will within the broader framework of his philosophy of spirit.
Eliade, M. (1987). The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
| This book examines the relationship between the sacred and the every day, examining how various cultures understand existence's supernatural and spiritual dimensions. Eliade's insights provide a foundational understanding of spirituality across different religious traditions.
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2021). Essential concepts in sociology. John Wiley & Sons.
| This textbook provides an in-depth examination of social structures, institutions, and cultural dynamics, highlighting the interplay between social and secular aspects of society. It covers key theories and contemporary issues, making it a valuable resource for understanding social interactions and secularism in a modern context.
Griffith, J. (2016). Freedom: The end of the human condition. WTM Publishing and Communications.
| Presents a comprehensive biological explanation for the human condition, addressing the fundamental question of why humans exhibit both 'good' and 'evil' behaviors. Griffith argues that this duality arises from a conflict between our gene-based instincts and our nerve-based capacity for conscious thought.
Kirby, J. (2016). Historians and the Church of England: religion and historical scholarship, 1870-1920. Oxford University Press.
| Historians and the Church of England: This work reviews the Church of England's influence on historical scholarship from 1870 to 1920, highlighting its interplay with religious and secular narratives.
Koyré, A. (1957). From the closed world to the infinite universe (Vol. 1). Library of Alexandria.
| From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe: Koyré investigates the philosophical and scientific shifts that led to modern cosmology, detailing the transition from a finite universe to an infinite one.
Mlodinow, L., & Hawking, S. (2010). The grand design. Random House.
| This book discusses the laws of nature, the universe's origins, and fundamental physical concepts, making it a great resource for understanding the interplay between the physical and natural dimensions. It also addresses how scientific principles shape our understanding of the universe.
Pereira, C. (2015). Soul & Consciousness. Scientific GOD Journal, 6(7).
| Explores the intricate relationship between the soul and consciousness, asserting that they are fundamentally interconnected. Pereira discusses personal experiences that illustrate how consciousness can resonate with others, highlighting emotional connections and the impact of these interactions.
Smith, H. (1986). The world’s religions: Our great wisdom traditions. Perfect Bound (HarperCollins Publishers).
| Smith provides a comparative overview of major world religions, exploring their spiritual dimensions and the influence of faith on societal norms and values.
Zafirovski, M. (2010). The Enlightenment and its effects on modern society. Springer Science & Business Media.
| Zafirovski, M. (2010). The Enlightenment and Its Effects on Modern Society: This book analyzes the impact of Enlightenment thought on contemporary social and political structures, highlighting its influence on individual freedoms and rationality.
